<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Exploit Intel — automation</title><link>https://exploit-intel.com/blog/tags/automation/</link><description>EIP research articles tagged automation.</description><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://exploit-intel.com/blog/tags/automation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Six AI Agents, One Security Company: The Paperclip AI Experiment</title><link>https://exploit-intel.com/blog/posts/six-ai-agents-one-security-company-the-paperclip-experiment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://exploit-intel.com/blog/posts/six-ai-agents-one-security-company-the-paperclip-experiment/</guid><description>We used Paperclip AI to stand up a six-agent AI company that now runs our exploit research pipeline almost entirely on autopilot - CVE candidate selection, forge dispatch, results collection, and SEO all managed autonomously. A CEO, a security researcher, a software engineer, a QA reviewer, a research intern, and a pipeline operator - all AI agents. They refactored four codebases into a clean monorepo, hardened the security, and built the MCP tools that now let the whole chain run without us touching a terminal. Four days, 135 issues, $180. The $1.38 QA agent found a bypass in the $115 engineer's security fix. This is the full story of the Paperclip AI experiment.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
