Exploit catalog results

Showing 1 PoC on this page

GitHub

BimBoxH4/CVE-2025-66039_CVE-2025-61675_CVE-2025-61678_reePBX

Repository PoCStars: 1Created 2025-12-14
ExploitCVE-2025-61675CVE-2025-61678CVE-2025-660393 files

34.1 KiB

Analysisdeepseek-v4-pro:cloud ·

Technical assessment

A Python-based tool that performs authenticated SQL injection exploitation (CVE-2025-61675) by inserting a new administrative user into the database, and attempts authenticated arbitrary file upload (CVE-2025-61678) leading to remote code execution via a PHP webshell. It also includes an authentication bypass check (CVE-2025-66039) to obtain a session cookie.

Backdoor review

No backdoor observed in reviewed code

The repository contains a Python-based vulnerability scanner for FreePBX systems targeting CVE-2025-66039, CVE-2025-61675, and CVE-2025-61678. The code performs authentication bypass via PHPSESSID extraction, file upload testing, and SQL injection detection/exploitation. All behavior is consistent with the stated purpose of a security assessment tool. No concealed backdoor, unrelated remote access, persistence mechanisms, or deceptive payloads were observed.

ClassificationExploit
Model confidence95%
AuthenticationRequired
Languagespython
Target softwareFreePBXFreePBX Endpoint Manager
Attack typessql injectionarbitrary file uploadauthentication bypass
Evidence & reasoningClassification basis · observed behavior · safety review
Technical evidence

Classification basis and observed behavior

Classification basis

The artifact's primary operation is to exploit vulnerabilities, not just detect them. The 'exploit_sql_injection' function executes an INSERT statement to add a new user to the database, and the 'upload_exploit' function uploads a PHP webshell to achieve remote code execution. The README and code comments refer to the tool as an 'Exploitation Tool'.

exploit.py:388-465exploit.py:160-227README.md:34

Requirements

  • Target must be running a vulnerable version of FreePBX with the Endpoint Manager module.README.md:23-25
  • For SQL injection and file upload, authentication is required. The tool attempts to bypass authentication using a hardcoded Authorization header.exploit.py:115-119

Observed behavior

  • Sends an HTTP GET request with a hardcoded Basic Authorization header to /admin/config.php to extract a PHPSESSID cookie, exploiting CVE-2025-66039.exploit.py:109-133
  • Constructs and sends a multipart/form-data POST request to /admin/ajax.php to upload a PHP file (text1.php) containing a simple echo statement, using a path traversal in the 'fwbrand' parameter to place it in the web root.exploit.py:160-227
  • Verifies the uploaded PHP file by sending a GET request to the target URL and checking for the expected random string in the response.exploit.py:256-284
  • Sends POST requests with SQL injection payloads to multiple endpoints (basestation, firmware, basefile, customExt) to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities.exploit.py:354-386
  • Exploits a confirmed SQL injection vulnerability by sending a crafted POST request to the customExt endpoint that executes an INSERT statement to add a new administrative user ('textuser') to the 'ampusers' table.exploit.py:388-465
Safety-review evidence

Behaviors behind the backdoor verdict

Observables

Credential Injection
Payload withheldHardcoded credentials injected via SQL exploit for testing purposes, consistent with PoC demonstration.exploit.py:403-404
File Upload Payload
Payload withheldUploads a simple PHP file to verify file upload vulnerability; no malicious webshell or backdoor code.exploit.py:168-226
Authentication Bypass
Payload withheldUses hardcoded Authorization header to bypass webserver authentication, matching CVE-2025-66039 description.exploit.py:115-118
Review boundaries

What the analysis did not establish

  • Evidence is limited to the source code and README; no runtime output or network captures are provided to confirm the exploit's effectiveness.
  • The analysis scope indicates 'complete_artifact_coverage: false' for the packet, meaning not all files from the repository may be present, though all selected text files are complete.
  • No binary files were present in the artifact.
  • The review is limited to the supplied text files; no runtime behavior or network traffic was observed.
Model interpretation

This review is limited to the supplied PoC code and context. It does not assert that the code works or is safe to execute.