Exploit catalog results

Showing 3 PoCs on this page

GitHub

machevalia/CVE-2024-0692-SolarWinds-SEM-RCE

Repository PoCStars: 0Created 2026-01-13
ExploitCVE-2024-06922 files

19.3 KiB

Analysisdeepseek-v4-pro:cloud ·

Technical assessment

A Python exploit for CVE-2024-0692 that targets SolarWinds Security Event Manager via AMF deserialization. It generates a malicious Java class for a reverse shell, hosts it on an HTTP server, constructs a C3P0 WrapperConnectionPoolDataSource AMF payload, sends it to the target, and provides an interactive shell handler.

Backdoor review

No backdoor observed in reviewed code

The supplied evidence is a single Python script (CVE-2024-0692.py) and a README. The script implements a publicly documented exploit for CVE-2024-0692, a SolarWinds SEM AMF deserialization RCE. It generates a reverse shell payload, hosts it via HTTP, sends the AMF exploit, and provides an interactive shell handler. All behavior is consistent with the stated exploit purpose. No concealed backdoor, unrelated remote access, persistence, credential theft, or deceptive payload targeting the person running the PoC was observed.

ClassificationExploit
Model confidence98%
AuthenticationNot required
LanguagesPythonJava
Target softwareSolarWinds Security Event Manager
Attack typesRemote Code ExecutionDeserialization of Untrusted Data
Evidence & reasoningClassification basis · observed behavior · safety review
Technical evidence

Classification basis and observed behavior

Classification basis

The artifact is a complete, self-contained exploit script that generates and delivers a deserialization payload to achieve remote code execution and provides an interactive reverse shell handler. It does not merely detect or report a vulnerability; it actively exploits it.

CVE-2024-0692.py:1-550

Requirements

  • Java 8+ JDK (javac) to compile the malicious payload classCVE-2024-0692.py:15
  • Python 3.6+ with requests libraryCVE-2024-0692.py:16-17
  • Network connectivity from attacker to target and from target back to attacker's HTTP server and reverse shell listenerCVE-2024-0692.py:12

Observed behavior

  • Compiles a Java class containing a reverse shell payload (bash and PowerShell variants)CVE-2024-0692.py:171-228
  • Starts an HTTP server to serve the compiled malicious class to the targetCVE-2024-0692.py:340-351
  • Generates an AMF3 deserialization payload using the C3P0 WrapperConnectionPoolDataSource gadget chainCVE-2024-0692.py:231-252
  • Sends the AMF payload via HTTP POST to the target's /services/messagebroker/streamingamf endpointCVE-2024-0692.py:354-390
  • Listens for and provides an interactive reverse shell sessionCVE-2024-0692.py:58-168
Safety-review evidence

Behaviors behind the backdoor verdict

Observables

Reverse Shell Listener
Payload withheldThis is the intended exploit behavior: receiving a reverse shell from the target after successful exploitation.CVE-2024-0692.py:58-168
Java Payload Generation
Payload withheldStandard reverse shell payload for RCE exploitation; no hidden or unrelated commands.CVE-2024-0692.py:171-228
Http Server
Payload withheldRequired for the C3P0 deserialization gadget to load the malicious class; serves only the expected class file.CVE-2024-0692.py:315-351
Amf Payload Construction
Payload withheldImplements the documented CVE-2024-0692 exploit technique; no extraneous payload data.CVE-2024-0692.py:231-293
Author Contact
Payload withheldAuthor identification in comments and banner; not a backdoor indicator.CVE-2024-0692.py:9CVE-2024-0692.py:416
Review boundaries

What the analysis did not establish

  • The evidence is limited to the source code of the exploit script and a README; no execution or runtime behavior was observed.
  • The C3P0 payload generation function (build_c3p0_hex_payload) appears incomplete or simplified, as it uses a hardcoded JNDI Reference hex template that does not incorporate the provided codebase_url and classname, which may affect reliability.
  • The exploit requires the target to be able to reach the attacker's HTTP server to load the malicious class, which may not be possible in all network configurations.
  • Only the two text files (CVE-2024-0692.py and README.md) were reviewed; no binary files were present in the evidence.
  • The review does not assess whether the exploit works as claimed or is safe to execute against authorized targets.
  • The Java payload is generated at runtime and compiled locally; its content is determined by user-supplied arguments and is not reviewed as a static artifact.
Model interpretation

This review is limited to the supplied PoC code and context. It does not assert that the code works or is safe to execute.

GitHub

machevalia/CVE-2025-14733

Repository PoCStars: 0Created 2025-12-23
ScannerCVE-2025-147332 files

17.4 KiB

Analysisdeepseek-v4-pro:cloud ·

Technical assessment

A Python-based network scanner that sends IKEv2 IKE_SA_INIT requests to detect WatchGuard Firebox appliances and identify versions potentially vulnerable to CVE-2025-14733. It parses vendor ID payloads to extract version and build numbers, then compares them against known affected ranges. The tool does not exploit the vulnerability.

Backdoor review

No backdoor observed in reviewed code

The repository contains a Python IKEv2 scanner and a README. The scanner sends standard IKE_SA_INIT probes, parses responses for WatchGuard vendor IDs and version strings, and compares versions against the CVE-2025-14733 advisory ranges. No backdoor, concealed payload, persistence, credential theft, or unrelated remote access behavior is present. The code performs only the documented scanning and version-checking operations.

ClassificationScanner
Model confidence98%
AuthenticationNot required
Languagespython
Target softwareWatchGuard Fireware OS
Attack typesscanner
Evidence & reasoningClassification basis · observed behavior · safety review
Technical evidence

Classification basis and observed behavior

Classification basis

The artifact is a scanner. It sends IKEv2 probes to detect WatchGuard devices and checks version strings against known affected ranges without attempting to trigger the out-of-bounds write vulnerability. The README explicitly states 'This tool performs safe version detection through standard IKEv2 negotiation. It does not attempt exploitation.' The code contains no exploit payloads, memory corruption triggers, or shellcode.

README.md:5CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:1-493

Requirements

  • Target must expose IKEv2 service on UDP port 500CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:306
  • Target must respond to IKE_SA_INIT with a valid IKEv2 response containing vendor ID payloadsCVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:115-224

Observed behavior

  • Sends a crafted IKE_SA_INIT request packet to the target on UDP port 500CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:328-329
  • Parses the IKEv2 response to extract vendor ID strings and identifies WatchGuard devices by looking for 'WatchGuard' or 'Firebox' substrings or base64-encoded version stringsCVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:163-219
  • Compares the extracted version against known affected ranges (11.10.2-11.12.4_Update1, 12.0-12.11.5, 2025.1-2025.1.3) to determine if the target is potentially vulnerableCVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:254-302
  • Outputs scan results to console and optionally to a JSON file, labeling hosts as VULNERABLE, NOT_VULNERABLE, or UNKNOWN_VERSIONCVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:465-489
Safety-review evidence

Behaviors behind the backdoor verdict

Observables

Network Probe
Payload withheldThe scanner sends a single IKE_SA_INIT request per target to elicit a version-disclosing response; this is the expected behavior for a detection tool.CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:67-112CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:306-329
Version Parsing
Payload withheldThe tool parses IKEv2 Vendor ID payloads to identify WatchGuard devices and extract Fireware OS version and build numbers for vulnerability comparison.CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:163-219
Vulnerability Check
Payload withheldThe check_vulnerable_version function implements the exact version ranges from the WatchGuard advisory without any exploitation attempt.CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py:254-302
Review boundaries

What the analysis did not establish

  • Analysis based solely on static source code review; code was not executed.
  • Only the two text files (scanner script and README) were provided; no binary or network capture evidence was included.
  • Only the two text files (CVE-2025-14733-Scanner.py and README.md) were provided; no other files exist in the repository snapshot.
  • Binary content is absent from the evidence; the analysis is limited to the supplied readable text.
Model interpretation

This review is limited to the supplied PoC code and context. It does not assert that the code works or is safe to execute.

GitHub

machevalia/OpenPLC-CVE-2021-31630-RCE

Repository PoCStars: 3Created 2025-06-23
Not analyzedCVE-2021-316304 files