PoC files

4 files

File viewing is interactive and short-lived. Downloads are password-protected ZIP archives using password eip.

GitHub

Analysisdeepseek-v4-pro:cloud ·

Technical assessment

The artifact is a Python-based mass exploitation tool for CVE-2026-15282. It detects vulnerable WordPress Instant Appointment plugin instances and exploits an unauthenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability to deploy a PHP webshell, achieving remote code execution.

Backdoor review

No backdoor observed in reviewed code

The PoC exploit for CVE-2026-15282 performs only the documented vulnerability exploitation: detecting the vulnerable plugin, uploading a PHP webshell via the unauthenticated AJAX handler, verifying RCE, and optionally cleaning up the shell. No concealed backdoor, unrelated payload, or deceptive behavior was observed in the supplied Python script or README.

ClassificationExploit
Model confidence100%
AuthenticationNot required
LanguagesPythonPHP
Target softwareWordPressInstant Appointment plugin
Attack typesRemote Code ExecutionArbitrary File Upload
Evidence & reasoningClassification basis · observed behavior · safety review
Technical evidence

Classification basis and observed behavior

Classification basis

The primary artifact is a Python script that actively exploits CVE-2026-15282 by uploading a PHP webshell to a vulnerable target and executing commands on it. The README explicitly describes it as a 'Mass RCE Exploit' and provides usage examples for exploitation. The code contains functions to detect, exploit, verify RCE, and clean up, which is characteristic of an exploit.

README.md:8cve_2026_15282.py:121-167cve_2026_15282.py:169-175

Requirements

  • Target must have the vulnerable Instant Appointment plugin (<= 1.2) installed and the 'add_service_front' AJAX action accessible.cve_2026_15282.py:100-119
  • The target server must allow outbound HTTP requests (for file_get_contents) or support data:// URIs.README.md:34-38

Observed behavior

  • Detects the presence of the Instant Appointment plugin by requesting known plugin paths and checking for the 'add_service_front' AJAX action.cve_2026_15282.py:100-119
  • Exploits the vulnerability by sending a POST request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with a base64-encoded PHP webshell payload in the 'image_url' parameter and a .php filename in the 'image_name' parameter.cve_2026_15282.py:121-167
  • Verifies remote code execution by requesting the uploaded webshell with a system command ('id') and checking for the expected output.cve_2026_15282.py:169-175
  • Optionally cleans up by deleting the uploaded webshell via a self-deletion command.cve_2026_15282.py:177-180
  • Supports mass scanning of multiple targets from a file with multi-threading and progress reporting.cve_2026_15282.py:227-288
Safety-review evidence

Behaviors behind the backdoor verdict

Observables

Webshell Upload
PHP code: '<?php echo "S|";system($_GET["c"]." 2>&1");echo "|E";'The exploit uploads a simple PHP webshell to the target server to demonstrate RCE, consistent with the described CVE.cve_2026_15282.py:124
Cleanup Mechanism
self._delete_shell() method and --no-cleanup flagThe script includes a cleanup mechanism that deletes the uploaded webshell after exploitation, unless the user explicitly opts out with --no-cleanup. This is standard for responsible PoC scripts.cve_2026_15282.py:177-180cve_2026_15282.py:210-212cve_2026_15282.py:309
Output Saving
Saves RCE URLs to a user-specified fileThe script can save discovered RCE URLs to a file for later use, a common feature in mass exploitation tools.cve_2026_15282.py:273-275
Review boundaries

What the analysis did not establish

  • One file (metadata only) was omitted from the evidence packet, but all readable text files are complete. The analysis is based solely on the provided source code and documentation; the code was not executed.
  • One file (metadata only, 70 bytes) was not included in the text analysis; its content is unknown but its small size and non-text classification make a backdoor payload unlikely.
  • The review is limited to the supplied static text; runtime behavior or external dependencies were not executed or analyzed.
Model interpretation

This review is limited to the supplied PoC code and context. It does not assert that the code works or is safe to execute.

Linked vulnerabilities

1