JUNG Smart Visu Server 1.1.1050 - Dos
PoC files
1 fileFile viewing is interactive and short-lived. Downloads are password-protected ZIP archives using password eip.
Analysis
Technical assessment
Python script that sends an unauthenticated POST request to /cgi-bin/reboot.sh or /cgi-bin/shutdown.sh on a JUNG Smart Visu Server to trigger a remote reboot or shutdown, causing denial of service.
Backdoor review
No backdoor observed in reviewed code
The PoC script sends an unauthenticated POST request to /cgi-bin/reboot.sh or /cgi-bin/shutdown.sh on the target JUNG Smart Visu Server to trigger a denial-of-service condition. No backdoor, deceptive payload, persistence mechanism, credential theft, or unrelated remote access behavior is present. The code performs only the advertised DoS action.
Classification basis and observed behavior
Classification basis
The script actively sends a crafted request to trigger a server reboot or shutdown, which is the intended exploitation of the vulnerability, not merely detection.
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:29-33exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:60-63exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:88Requirements
- Target running JUNG Smart Visu Server <= 1.1.1050
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:10 - Network access to the target server
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:111
Observed behavior
- Sends an unauthenticated POST request to /cgi-bin/reboot.sh or /cgi-bin/shutdown.sh
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:30-33exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:66-73 - Interprets HTTP 200, 302, 301, timeout, or connection error as likely successful exploitation
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:78-98
Behaviors behind the backdoor verdict
Observables
- Url
- /cgi-bin/reboot.shEndpoint targeted by the PoC to trigger a server reboot.
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:31 - Url
- /cgi-bin/shutdown.shEndpoint targeted by the PoC to trigger a server shutdown.
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:32 - Http Method
- POSTHTTP method used to send the exploit request.
exploits/multiple/webapps/52536.py:66
What the analysis did not establish
- Only the single Python file was analyzed; no external libraries or referenced resources were inspected.
- The script's actual effectiveness or safety was not tested; classification is based solely on code intent.
- Only the supplied text file was reviewed; no binary files or external resources were inspected.
- The review does not assess whether the target endpoints are actually vulnerable or whether the script works as intended.
This review is limited to the supplied PoC code and context. It does not assert that the code works or is safe to execute.